Monday June 1, 2009  BACK   NEXT

Are we sure Dion misunderstood?
By Angelo Persichilli
THE HILL TIMES

As an Italian immigrant, Im always sympathetic, for obvious reasons, to the linguistic challenges of others.

I have neither the professional nor the moral authority to scoff at peoples knowledge of the English language. And, for the record, I have no desire to do so.

However, after reading last weeks Canadian Broadcast Standards Councils deliberations on the infamous interview between CTV Atlantic and the then-leader of the Liberal Party, Stéphane Dion, I feel obligated to venture into this debate, as a journalist and a language-challenged Canadian.

The interview was taped on Oct. 9, five days before the federal election in a CTV studio in Halifax.

CTV news anchor Steve Murphy, someone I enjoy watching, asked a question Dion did not understand three times. The Liberal leader asked to stop the taping and start over again. Dions assistants asked CTV not to air that first take and CTV accepted the request.

Murphy started the interview again and still Dion didnt understand the question. One of Dions advisers then explained the question to the leader. Still he didnt understand and the taping was stopped again. If I remember correctly, the third take was the charm.

Last week, the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council ruled that CTV was unfair with Dion after asking a poorly framed question, later failed to clarify it, and acted unethically because they aired the outtakes despite promising not to do so.

Well, lets see what the question was: If you were Prime Minister now, what would you have done about the economy and this crisis that Mr. Harper has not done? As I said at the beginning, my background doesnt give me the authority to scrutinize others people language skills, so can somebody, please, explain to me whats not clear about Murphys question? Can the council explain why this question is poorly framed? The council also writes that the interviewer failed to clarify the question after Dions request to give more details. I sincerely dont see which part of the question Dion would have been unable to understand, even because, as we could hear on the background, even one of his handlers explained the question to him.

Still he did not understand.

And there is nothing wrong with that.

So, why is it so hard for some to accept the fact that Dions English was not good enough? Is that because many immigrants are at best tolerated when they look for jobs and have trouble expressing themselves in one of the official languages? Lately they have also been told that if they dont speak the language to not even bother trying to come to Canada.

Furthermore, there are millions of unilingual Canadian citizens (namely Canadians that dont speak French) who, on a daily basis, are discriminated and barred from many less important federal jobs because they are not bilingual, yet we are now re-writing the entire English language to fit the political aspiration of someone who wants to become Prime Minister of Canada because he only speaks French? Let me be clear. I believe that no Canadian should be barred from becoming Prime Minister because he or she doesnt speak English (or French) and no Canadian citizen should be barred from a federal position because they dont speak French.

In fact, I am also sure that Dion did not fail to become Prime Minister because of his language, but because he was not a good leader and did not have good policies.

Jean Chrétien was no Shakespeare in English, but still he became one of the best Prime Ministers in recent history.

So, why are we afraid to say that Dions English skills were not good? Why are we all hypersensitive if a political leader doesnt speak perfect French language, while we try to change the English language to accommodate anyone else?

One last point.

I understand that when you make a commitment not to air the outtakes you should honour it. It is also understood that the commitment was made at the beginning, when a mistake can be accepted as just that. When, however, you keep making the same mistake over and over, its not a mistake anymore.

Home | Web cam | Archive | Comments

 

?>