Monday Mar. 16,
2009 BACK NEXT
IGNATIEFF, THE MOVE TO
THE CENTRE by Angelo
Persichilli THE HILL TIMES
The
task for Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff is simple to define, but
hard to implement. On the one hand, he has to draw a line between
himself and Prime Minister Stephen Harper while also support the
government's budget and economic plan.
The challenge is
obvious in the daily Question Period and made more clear during a
meeting in Toronto last week with a group of journalists.
Ignatieff confirmed that he is moving his party to the
centre and ditched the coalition government idea because of the
presence of the Bloc Québécois: "One of the reasons that I have
found difficult to form a coalition government, I could be sitting
here as your Prime Minister, but I turned it down because I didn't
think it was right for someone who believes in the national unity of
my country to make a deal with people who want split the country
up."
He also qualified his view on the presence of the Bloc
in the House: "Let's get this right because it's important. The Bloc
Québécois is a duly-democratically-elected [party by] fellow
citizens of our country. Many of them are very good MPs, good
people. But they have a different objective than mine."
Ignatieff said that "in a period of a very serious economic
crisis, what is not said strongly enough to Quebec is that you
should thank your lucky stars that you are in Canada."
He
said Canada's "banking system is the best in the world, a currency
that is the strongest internationally," adding that "Canadian
institutions kept Quebec from experiencing a more severe recession.
I'm convinced that an independent Quebec would not have weathered
this crisis as successfully as Quebec has done in Canada. I have
respect but fundamental disagreements with my Bloc's colleagues,
many of them are friends. I didn't like the way Harper called them
traitors to the country."
Ignatieff is also trying to
distance his party from the Conservative government.
He said
the Liberals must work with the Conservative government, despite
"profound disagreements" because the economic crisis requires
cooperation. "The car is in the ditch. I don't like the driver and I
don't like the direction, but I'm willing to push to get the car out
of the ditch. I have quarrels with the budget and I don't think it
does what is needed to do. But it's better than nothing."
He
said that he has done his part "because the budget has been
approved. Now Mr. Harper has to do his part and spend the money
properly."
He also refuted the accusation that his party is
holding up money needed for the economic recovery: "I'm trying to
make Parliament work, that's what Canadians want. It is a fact that
this budget was approved more rapidly of any other budget, except
one, in Canadian history. If Mr. Harper is telling you that we are
holding [up] the money, Mr. Harper is wrong. The problem is that Mr.
Harper wants $3-billion and he wouldn't tell us what that is for."
So where is he taking his party? What is going to make his
party different from the Conservatives? He admitted that he is
repositioning his party by abandoning the left-leaning course set by
his predecessor Stéphane Dion: "Yes, I'm moving the party to the
centre because I think we win from the centre. We win when people
believe we are moderate, pragmatic, sensible party that connects to
what Canadians are worried about."
During the lengthy
meeting he also talked about Afghanistan, China, and the Middle
East.
"We are in Afghanistan until 2011," he said, "because
we made a promise to the Afghan government and we made a promise to
NATO and Canada keeps its promises. But I believe that after 2011 we
should end our military commitment to combat in Kandahar and I think
we should stay committed to development and I hope we can increase
our development assistance and stay engaged in diplomatic and
political front."
He said he believes that the Afghan issues
can be solved only by dealing with the region's turmoil. "Pakistan
needs to be secured against India, tension in Kashmir has to be
brought down, Iran needs to be drawn in because it can be helpful
because as much influence in Western Afghanistan, the Russians can
be a positive role, as well as the Chinese. What we need is a
regional strategy that will look at the whole thing," he said,
adding that "this is the difference between Liberals and
Conservatives. In fact, the Conservatives don't have a strategy."
|