By Angelo
Persichilli
THE HILL TIMES
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Stephen Harper, whose
government will release a budget with a $30-billion deficit next
week, says "this is the one time where governments should be coming
into the economy," and hopes the
government can
not only sustain economic activity in the short-term, but
over
the longer term as well in order to be stronger than before
the recession.
Moreover, Mr. Harper (Calgary Southwest, Alta.)
says since becoming Prime Minister the biggest surprise has been how
his job is focused on foreign affairs in this "modern, integrated,
global economy," and says he hopes to find common ground with the
next president of the United States, Barack Obama, on energy,
climate change, the economy and Afghanistan.
Why do
you think this budget is different from the others?
"Well, every budget's different, but obviously we're in a
different economic [situation] than we've been in since—at least
since I've been Prime Minister—and for a long, long time, and that
is we're obviously in the midst of a global economic recession that
is making its effects felt in this country. And look, the economic
circumstances that we're seeing now are something we have not seen
in a very long time, and that is; first of all, globally, the level
of instability in the financial system, in markets, and we've seen
downturns before, but we haven't seen this kind of instability in a
long, long time. And we also have a phenomenon right now where we
know there's money out there, money that is sitting on the sidelines
because people are afraid to spend because they're afraid about the
future [and] where businesses are afraid to invest because of the
volatility in markets, falling prices, [and] falling profits. Even
bond-holders are worried about capital losses. Everybody is just
sitting on the money and nothing's happening and things, you know,
globally continue to go down."
So, what can you
do?
"You know, my training as economist tells me that
this is the one time where governments should be coming into the
economy, borrowing money, borrowing that money that is sitting there
at low interest rates and putting it into productive economic
activity. And that's what we're going to do in this budget, with a
two-fold purpose: to sustain economic activity in the short-term
[because] in the next couple of years, a lot of what we'll be doing
will be time-limited measures, [over] the next couple of years. But
also in many cases, to take the opportunity to make some investments
for the longer term so that when, as the recovery occurs, and it
will, that we come out of this stronger than before."
It's very hard to make predictions in this kind of
environment. Do you think that Canada will see growth at the end of
the year, or in 2010?
"Normally, when governments
prepare budgets, they ask the private-sector economists and
forecasters to give their best judgments for a year. We have never
seen such variability in these forecasts before. As a consequence,
this government has been doing forecasts basically every month and
every month, those forecasts have been changing. So I think we've
all learned by now not to make predictions—you know, I like the Yogi
Berra quote: 'Predictions are hard to make, especially about the
future.' "
So no predictions?
"Look,
what we're going to do is we'll be taking a look at the most recent
private-sector forecast, I'm led to believe are just coming in now.
We'll use those in the budget but we will probably take a
pessimistic view, we'll take the lower end of those forecasts. We'll
assume that we've got some pretty big challenges in the next couple
of years and we'll plan for that. And, as I say, we will be
borrowing money, spending money, making sure there's additional
economic activity. But also making sure, trying to make sure that
the deficits we bring in are short term as well."
More than a month ago, you and Ontario Premier
Dalton McGuinty made a statement about helping out the auto
industry. It was in Toronto. Both of you said that you were going to
monitor how things were proceeding. After a month, can you say
something?
"All I will say is we've had some mixed
signals from the auto companies in the few weeks following that
announcement. We keep getting different reads on what their
financial situation is. But we are both governments and obviously
[we] and the government of the United States are working with them
very closely to ascertain what the real situation is and what has to
be done. And, as you know, it is not a simple matter of throwing
some money into the industry and bailing them out. There's going to
have to be some serious restructuring to make that industry, those
companies, viable in the longer term."
Are you
optimistic on this subject?
"This is going to be an
extremely difficult file. I don't want to tell, you know, we're in
there to make sure we do not have a catastrophic collapse of this
industry. I don't want to tell you that there won't be job losses or
there won't be lower wages. I mean, these are all big risks in this
industry. But we will be there to do two things: to help a
transition to a more viable industry and to make sure, as I said in
December, that we do our share so that the industry is not
restructured by the United States government entirely into the
United States. That is obviously the biggest reason for our
involvement, to make sure that we keep our share of the industry."
More and more things can only be solved
internationally. Do you think that there is a need to redefine the
role of the Prime Minister and the role of the minister of foreign
affairs?
"No, you know, I think it's been the case in
the modern age that the Prime Minister invariably plays a
significant role in international affairs. Obviously, the Foreign
Affairs minister dedicates himself entirely to foreign affairs and
is able to travel the world and dialogue with his counterparts with
a frequency that the Prime Minister is not able to do so, but in the
modern age of travel and communications. And, you know, in the
interconnected global world, it's inevitable that a big part of the
Prime Minister's job is foreign affairs. I think you've heard me say
before that people have asked me what are the biggest surprises
since I came to office, and probably one of the biggest surprises is
the degree to which my term as Prime Minister and my time as Prime
Minister is used for foreign affairs. You really do realize very
quickly in the modern integrated global economy that there are a lot
of our problems that cannot be solved nationally, or more
importantly, the national solution, has to take into account what
others are doing. It's unavoidable."
You will see
Barack Obama when he's here. And there are many issues you are going
to talk about, of course. The first issue you raised after his
victory was the environment. Do you think that there is a common
ground with him and do you think that having a common ground with
Obama would create a kind of friction with Alberta?
"If
I can give a kind of just a little introduction to my comments
there, which is first of all we're delighted that President Obama,
president-elect Obama, has decided to make Canada his first foreign
trip. As you know, this had been a tradition of American presidents
prior to the last Liberal government and we kind of got away from
that. And so I'm really, really pleased that President Obama has
decided to do this. I think we've been trying to rebuild our
relationship since we came to office and I think this is a real sign
that the Americans, you know, have appreciated that and see benefit
themselves to doing it. I said when ... after his election that I
see three areas where I think we have a lot of potential common
ground. One is on the whole linkage of issues around energy and the
environment. And, you know, it obviously for the United States is
not just about climate change or reducing greenhouse gases. It's
also about ensuring their energy security because the United States
is fundamentally an energy-deficient country with enormous national
security issues that revolve around energy. And those can't be
separated from trying to deal with the climate change issue. So I
think that, and you know, obviously for Canada, it's hard for us to
deal with the climate change issue effectively when we have an
integrated economy and anything we do to our industry impacts their
continental competitiveness. So I think there's a tremendous
opportunity for us to look at working together, or at least to learn
from what each other is trying to do in that area."
And the second area?
"A second area
that is obviously going to be very critical is the economy and the
auto sector is the most concrete example where, you know, the
cooperation we've had with the Bush Administration I suspect will
continue with the Obama Administration on the auto sector. But, you
know, obviously in terms of preparing for G8, G20 meetings and many
of the shared challenges we have on the continent, I think we'll
have a very useful dialogue there. And then third and finally, the
United States has enormous, you know, enormous international
obligations and international concerns around the world, and we are
a part of all of those and we can't obviously solve all of those,
but in areas where we are engaged with them like Afghanistan, you
know, these are tremendous opportunities to develop our important
relationship."