Monday
Oct. 13,
2008 BACK | NEXT
And now what!?
by Angelo
Persichilli THE HILL
TIMES
What are we going to do now? After 38 days of an
intense, nasty, expensive and, I might add unfortunately, useless
election campaign, we’re back to square one and Canada still seems
to be without a stable government ready to take on the domestic and
international challenges ahead. Taking for granted that Canadians
didn’t trust any political organization with a majority mandate,
does this all mean that we’re going back to another raucous and
dysfunctional Parliament we had up until last spring, or is there a
possibility of other combinations? Unfortunately, there are not
many political combinations available for an alternative to a
single-party majority government. The only ideological and remote
possibility of a coalition involving the Conservatives is the
cooperation with the Liberals, or part of its caucus. But this is
impossible because both organizations consider themselves
“government” and any coalition is out of the question. True, the
Conservatives were able to remain in power thanks to Liberal
support, but that relationship can’t be by any stretch of
imagination considered cooperation between the two
parties. Liberals were not supporting Conservatives. They were
just waiting for the proper time to topple them. All other
possible coalitions exclude the participation of the
Conservatives. The most logical combination might come from a
coalition between the NDP and the Liberals. This worked in 1985
in Ontario when the New Democratic Party of Bob Rae decided to throw
its support behind the Liberal Party of David Peterson, putting an
end to two decades of Conservative dominance in the biggest Canadian
province. The lieutenant governor of Ontario gave the mandate to
form the government to the Conservative Party of Frank Miller whose
party elected the most MPPs, but without reaching the majority. When
Miller failed to find any support from the Liberals and also from
the NDP, he gave the mandate to David Peterson who coordinated an
agenda with Rae who, in return, supported the Liberal government at
Queen’s Park. It was not a real coalition because the NDP gave its
“external” support to the Liberal government without having its own
members in the provincial executive. But this kind of cooperation
looks like it might be difficult at this time. At the beginning of
the campaign, NDP Leader Jack Layton seemed open to this suggestion
but in an interview last week told me that he never mentioned a
coalition with the Liberals in case none of the
national political parties would get a majority
mandate. Layton said it was the media incorrectly reporting his
words. And I don’t blame Layton because, considering the Ontario
experience with the Liberals, it doesn’t look good for the New
Democrats. In fact, the NDP provided an agenda to the Liberals
and when Peterson felt confident enough with the electorate,
unceremoniously dropped Bob Rae after two years and won a huge
majority in 1987. Besides, nobody expects that the combined
numbers of members of Parliament between Liberals and NDP would be
enough to get a majority going beyond 155 MPs. Of course, there
is also the Bloc Québécois of Gilles Duceppe. As in the past, this
political organization has been available to support specific
initiatives of federal governments. However, I doubt that any of the
federalist political organizations would be officially in bed with a
separatist party. Then again, there is another possibility: all
pollsters will be proven wrong and, after Oct. 14, they will be
forced to close shop and sent back to school if one of the major
parties will elect more than 155 MPs. However, on this possibility I
wouldn’t bet a lot of money.
This
means that if cool heads don’t prevail, and considering the personal
and nasty campaign we have just witnessed, we’re in for
a rough ride ahead and right at the time when we need
a steady guide at the
switch.
|