Monday Dec. 18, 2006 | BACK | NEXT

Liberal leadership: winners and non-winners
by Angelo Persichilli
THE HILL TIMES

A leadership convention is a race and, like all races, is about winners and losers. A friend told me it’s not nice to talk about “losers” during the festive Christmas season, so, from now on I will refer to them as non-winners.

          In Montreal, Stéphane Dion won, but it is not necessarily true that the others lost.

          A victory or a defeat is not just about numbers; behind every winner or non-winner are strategies, organizations, money, and, most of all, people.

          So, who are the winners and the non winners of the recent Montreal Liberal convention? I’ll start with the candidates themselves, then move on to the so-called movers and shakers behind the candidates.

          Of course, the real winner is Dion. He came from the back of the pack with many pundits quite skeptical about his chances.

          Eventually, thanks to his perseverance and, let’s say, some fortuitous circumstances, he was able to get to the top. Congratulations.

          Michael Ignatieff is not, obviously, the winner but it would be unfair to call him, let me say it once, a loser.

          Only a few months ago, he was basically a foreigner. He has been able to come back to Canada, win a nomination in the Toronto riding of Etobicoke-Lakeshore, Ont., and the following election became an MP. Immediately, he became a leadership candidate and was able to keep his name even on the last ballot.

          He’s not a winner, but he has established himself as a powerbroker in the Liberal Party of the future. As for the future chances of becoming a leader, I believe that his age will be a factor.

          According to some insiders, Bob Rae feels very bad about the results.

          He shouldn’t. Of course he did not win, but he was coming from way behind. In fact, nobody was giving him any chance of victory only a few months ago and some wondered if his decision to run was made while smoking funny cigarettes. He proved everybody else, including myself, wrong. In Montreal, many changed their opinion and were predicting, or, at least accepting the possibility, of a victory.

          In Montreal he may not have won, but has been able to establish himself as a Liberal. He is not (let me say it again) a loser, but he will become one if he doesn’t accept the results and if he does not run in the next election. If he doesn’t, it sends a message that he is arrogant and too much in love with himself.

          After Dion, the other real winner is Gerard Kennedy. The political capital gained by Dion in Montreal is current, but Kennedy’s is only potential. He has established himself as a national leader wellpoised for the next run, if he keeps working as hard as he did during the campaign, if he learns French well enough to be a factor in Quebec, and if he smooths relationships in Ontario, especially with some of his former colleagues at Queen’s Park.

          Ken Dryden has gained at the end of the process. He has been able to promote his views, his communications skills have improved and he has established a base in the Liberal Party. Has he increased his potential as a future leadership candidate? Like Ignatieff, I believe Dryden’s age will be a factor.

          As for Joe Volpe, I can say that at the end of the process, he is less feared than at the beginning and more liked at the end.

          Saying more about his leadership stunt wouldn’t be about him but about some media and journalists, and the former executive in charge of the Liberal Party operations. As I said at the beginning, we are in a Christmas mood and I have to take a rain check with those individuals. At the end, he lost some, and gained some. In the balance, he might be even, even though he has forfeited any future leadership ambitions.

          Scott Brison and Martha Hall Findlay got, I hope, exactly what they were looking for: an opportunity to establish themselves in the Liberal Party, increase their credibility within the organization and to be ready for future engagements. I did not completely understand why Brison supported Bob Rae on the second ballot, but I believe he played his cards right.

          Hall Findlay has to be praised for what she did and her presence on the stage in Montreal among seven male candidates was a constant reminder that political organizations talk about women (and minorities) but, at the end of the day, politics is still a white male-dominated business.

          Victories and defeats are more than just numbers. Behind each candidate there are people who must be praised for their hard work and dedication. However, even amongst them, there are winners and non winners.

          Let’s take a pick at the names behind the scenes of the four major candidates, starting with Dion’s camp. The top winner is Mark Marissen. He has been able to establish himself as a successful national organizer. He succeeded in recycling himself from a Martinite into a neutral powerbroker respected in all camps. Also very much appreciated is the work done by George Young, a true Liberal, Andrew Bevan, and André Lamarre, the people who handled Dion’s communications. Part of the team was also Tim Murphy, former chief of the staff in Paul Martin’s PMO. Murphy, however, played a peripheral role, missing, in my opinion, an opportunity to be more involved.

          As for the MPs, the good work by Bryon Wilfert has to be noted. His political potential, with Dion’s victory, has increased. Dion, however, owes a lot to a very active group of women MPs and former MPs like Colleen Beaumier, Bonnie Brown, Sue Barnes, Eleni Bakopanos and Paddy Torsney. Without them, his campaign would not have gotten off the ground.

          In Michael Ignatieff camp, praise must be given to the work done by communications guru Bob Richardson. Had he been brought into the camp earlier, I’m sure many of the blunders during the early Iggy campaign would have been avoided.

          A winner is also Sen. Grant Mitchell, a fine organizer, as well as MP Paul Zed, whose contribution to the campaign has been invaluable, like policy adviser Brad Davis. Good marks also for Ignatieff’s team on the floor in Montreal, especially Leslie Church.

          Non-winners? Well, Ian Davey, and Iggy’s Quebec Lieutenant Denis Coderre. Davey decided too soon to play in the big leagues and he was not ready. He has time to prove himself in the future. Coderre took many risks supporting Ignatieff against a Quebec native son. He lost and, more importantly, he might have lost his opportunity to run for the leadership next time. Of course, everybody says that the alternating process doesn’t exist in the Liberal Party but, definitely the chances for another francophone Liberal leader after Dion look very slim. Another non-winner is Sen. David Smith, even though he delivered what he had promised: a bus load of MPs supporting Ignatieff, his influence in the party has dramatically reduced.

          In the Bob Rae camp the big non-winner is John Rae. He misread the anti-Rae sentiments in Ontario and, after losing control of the party under Chrétien’s leadership and seeming shocked at the defeat of his brother in Montreal, raises questions about how close he is to the new reality of the Liberal Party. Another non-winner is MP Maurizio Bevilacqua, not necessarily because he did not support a winner candidate from the beginning, but because he supported a candidate who was the symbol of all economic theories he has always fought against. Some of his supporters are confused.

          There were some gains in the Rae camp from organizer Raj Chahal. As for the Ontario Minister of Finance, Greg Sorbara, he has gained because he was right when he assessed Rae’s popularity in Canada, he has lost because he misread Rae’s unpopularity in Ontario. This means that in the next 10 months he has to focus more on the province and less on the nation. Good work in Rae’s camp was also done by Alex Swann, press secretary, Sen. Mac Harb, organizer, and Isabel Metcalfe.

          Lastly, Kennedy’s camp: the winners are the 10 MPs who stuck together until the end and, basically, they chose the winner. Particularly efficient was MP Navdeep Bains, who was very active within the South Asian delegates (however, it looks like they are now fighting with each other). Also, there was a good job by campaign manager Katie Telford, director of communications Amanda Alvaro, and Bruce Young, the former Martinite who delivered B.C. Another winner was Justin Trudeau. He took some risks and contributed to shake up the convention.

StatCounter - Free Web Tracker and Counter

 Home | Web cam | Archive | Comments