Monday Nov. 7, 2005 | BACK | NEXT

Ottawa, a skunk fight festival

by Angelo Persichilli
THE HILL TIMES

Last week was one of the most chaotic weeks in federal politics. It was a skunk fight festival, a free-for-all. Liberals were divided and dispirited in their effort to keep this brain-dead government alive. But oddly, in this Parliament, there's a minority government, a minority opposition, and no one is winning in this chaotic skunk fight.

            Let's start with the ubiquitous NDP which is playing both sides of the fence. NDP Leader Jack Layton means well, but he's trying to make the best out of his own precarious situation. This is also his own fault because he is accepting a mediocre government in order to influence the national agenda. Mr. Layton knows that a country cannot be run through ultimatums or political stunts, and he should remember that mediocrity is bad for everybody. As for the Conservatives, they should stop trying to convince Canadians that it's time for an alternative; Canadians know that. It's the Conservatives' job to convince Canadians that they are the alternative. Stephen Harper has a lot of potential and his party might easily form the next government.

            However, I'm convinced that if this happens, it won't be because of the Gomery Inquiry and the corruption in the Liberal Party of Canada.

            The Sponsorship Scandal is already factored into the electoral attitude of Canadian voters. Corruption has lowered the Liberal vote to a point that victory is within reach for the Conservatives. But the Conservatives need to provide that extra mile. Mr. Harper has to stop talking like he's the leader of the opposition and present himself to the Canadians as the Prime-Minister-in-waiting.

            Last week, they still gave the wrong message. The dogfight in the House Immigration Committee is hardly the right way to prove the Conservatives are the right party to govern this country. Blocking an immigration reform that affects thousands of people is hardly good politics on the eve of an election and it is not good for the country.

            I understand their strong reaction when Liberals label the federal Conservatives as a party that's insensitive to the needs of the poor, immigrants and less fortunate people in general. I know it is not true. But they have to stop giving Liberals ammunition to play the role of the country's conscience (the NDP is already doing a good job of playing this role). It goes without saying that they are not against immigrants: A quick look at the composition of their caucus would confirm that. But stopping a piece of legislation that benefits immigrants only feeds the Liberals rhetoric.

            On the positive side, there was last Friday's announcement from Mr. Harper about how he would bring in new rules on political donations. These are the initiatives that Canadians would like to see from a government-in-waiting and this is the way Mr. Harper will fill the gap that separates him from forming a government.

            Before I mention the Bloc Québécois, it is necessary to talk about the Liberals and their philosophy. Or, better, their philosophies; one for Quebec, one for the rest of the country. The last time the Conservatives were able to develop such duplicity, was when Brian Mulroney was leader.

            At the present time, Paul Martin and his gang have been able to destroy the party's credibility in Quebec. They are trying to win over voters by saying that it was not them but the "other" Liberals who made mistakes. They’re trying to convince voters that Paul Martin, the prime minister, is not the same Paul Martin who was minister of finance. Good luck. That's dreaming in Technicolor in an era when all politicians are painted with the same brush.

            Mr. Martin and his gang have destroyed the Liberal party's credibility and its remaining organization in Quebec. But to make matters worse, they're also destroying one of their strongest electoral bases in Quebec which is the ethnic vote as former premier Jacques Parizeau eloquently described it following the 1995 referendum on sovereignty.

            Prime Minister Paul Martin's attitude towards Alfonso Gagliano hasn't helped either. The courts will decide whether Alfonso Gagliano is innocent, but Martin judged him even before Mr. Gomery started his inquiry. Meantime, the Parti Québécois and Bloc Québécois are coming dangerously close to penetrating in ridings dominated by immigrants that were once Liberal strongholds.

            "The Liberal Party is out of commission in Quebec for a long time," Mr. Gagliano told the Corriere Canadese last week. "In order to rebuild it, they need at least 10 years." And, no matter what you think about Gagliano and his ministerial skills, nobody can question his political instinct and organizational abilities.

 Home | Web cam | Archive | Comments